Legal proceedings regarding a lawsuit aiming to prevent former President Donald Trump from pursuing a White House candidacy once more have taken a significant step, shifting the case's jurisdiction from state to federal court. This initial maneuver represents the initial move in what is poised to be a complex and intricate legal battle, with the ultimate destination potentially being the United States Supreme Court.
The lawsuit was initially filed by the liberal organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) in a Colorado state court. Their argument centers on a clause dating back to the Civil War era, which prohibits individuals who have previously taken an oath to uphold the Constitution and subsequently engaged in "insurrection" from seeking higher office. CREW contends that this provision should bar Trump from running for the presidency in 2024.
The state judge initially assigned to the case in Denver opted to recuse himself, citing an undisclosed conflict of interest. Subsequently, Trump's legal team made the strategic decision to transfer the case to federal court. Their rationale behind this move is rooted in the belief that the case revolves around a constitutional issue, necessitating resolution at the federal level. Conversely, the plaintiffs in the case are expected to argue for the matter's return to state court, setting the stage for a legal dispute that is projected to reach the upper echelons of the federal judicial system.
In their legal filings, Trump's attorneys stated, "Plaintiffs’ challenge to Colorado’s ability to place Donald Trump on the presidential ballot depends solely on the Fourteenth Amendment. Trump’s basis for removal of the state court action is federal question jurisdiction under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment."
CREW's lawsuit is the first in a series of anticipated challenges that will be filed in various states by the organization, alongside another liberal nonprofit named Free Speech for People. While activists in some states have initiated lawsuits representing themselves, legal experts contend that the more comprehensive complaints lodged by these nonprofits are more likely to ultimately find their way to the nation's highest court. This is particularly noteworthy as the Supreme Court has never issued a ruling on the specific clause being invoked in this lawsuit.
Reacting to the legal action, Trump criticized the liberal organization CREW, suggesting its affiliation with numerous individuals who have been critical of him and with whom he had contentious interactions during his presidency. On his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump referred to the group as "TRUMP DERANGED CREW" and accused it of making "ridiculous" and "Unconstitutional" efforts to disqualify him.
CREW has disclosed its intention to request a federal judge to return the case to the state court. Additionally, the organization has sought a swift resolution of the issues involved, with an eye on Colorado's Republican primary ballot, which is scheduled to be finalized on January 5.
Â
