Mahatma Gandhi, revered as an emblem of peace and a champion of non-violence during the 20th century, curiously never received the coveted Nobel Peace Prize, despite being nominated on five separate occasions. This intriguing omission raises questions that warrant exploration.
Gandhi, a prominent figure instrumental in liberating India from the clutches of a 200-year British colonial rule, found himself in the spotlight of Nobel Peace Prize nominations in five distinct years: 1937, 1938, 1939, 1947, and mere days before his tragic assassination in 1948. The fact that he never clinched the prize has become a topic of extensive discourse and speculation over time.
Unraveling the intricacies behind this perplexing decision reveals a complex tapestry of factors. Foremost among them was the challenge of fitting Mahatma Gandhi into the predefined categories the Nobel Committee had established for potential laureates. He did not neatly align with their conventional molds for prize recipients. According to the committee's criteria, Gandhi did not fall into the usual roles of politicians or advocates of international law. Nor could he be pigeonholed as a primary figure in humanitarian relief work or an organizer of international peace congresses.
Gandhi's approach to peace and non-violence was uniquely groundbreaking, which may have perplexed the committee, leaving them grappling with the evaluation of his contributions within their established framework.
Additionally, the Nobel Committee harbored reservations about Gandhi's pacifism and his involvement in the turbulent events surrounding the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947. Some committee members questioned his impartiality in the conflict and doubted his unwavering commitment to peace. These concerns inevitably weighed on their decision not to bestow him with the prestigious accolade.
It's important to note that during that era, there was no tradition for the Nobel Committee to employ the Peace Prize as a tool to foster peaceful resolutions to regional conflicts.
Another significant issue was the absence of precedent for posthumous awards. Gandhi met a tragic end, assassinated merely two days before the closing date for the 1948 Nobel Peace Prize nominations. While the statutes of the Nobel Foundation at the time did allow for posthumous awards under certain circumstances, Gandhi's unique situation posed challenges. He did not represent an organization, and he had not left a will, leaving uncertainty about the rightful recipient of the prize money.
Ultimately, the committee opted against a posthumous award, citing concerns that it would run counter to the intentions of the Nobel Prize's founder.
A glimpse into the diary of Norwegian economist Gunnar Jahn reveals that the Nobel Committee indeed considered a posthumous award for Gandhi but, due to formalities and regulations, chose not to proceed. Consequently, they reserved the prize for that year, and a year later, the committee did not allocate the 1948 prize money at all.
It's worth noting that later members of the Nobel Committee publicly expressed remorse over Gandhi's absence from the list of laureates. When the Dalai Lama was honored with the Peace Prize in 1989, the committee chairman noted that the award was, in part, a homage to the memory of Mahatma Gandhi. This, perhaps, serves as a belated acknowledgment of his enduring legacy as a symbol of peace and non-violence.
Â
