The recent ruling by the Supreme Court in the electoral bonds case represents a significant stride forward for the preservation of the right to information (RTI). This landmark decision assumes paramount importance, particularly at a juncture when both opposition parties and activists have been vocal about their concerns regarding the purported weakening of the RTI framework.
Addressing the issue, Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud emphasized the fundamental nature of the right to information, stating unequivocally that any encroachment upon it cannot be justified. The apex court's decision to invalidate the electoral bonds scheme, which facilitated anonymous financial contributions to political parties, stems from its recognition that such anonymity obstructs transparency and consequently impinges upon the right to free speech and expression enshrined under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.
The verdict resonates deeply with the demands articulated by the petitioners, who have long contended that the electoral bonds scheme enables donors and political entities to shield their association from public scrutiny, thereby circumventing the purview of the Right to Information Act.
In asserting the citizens' right to information, the petitioners underscored the necessity of disclosing details concerning the monetary contributions made to political parties, including the identity of donors and the amounts involved. Hence, the Supreme Court's ruling stands as a resounding affirmation of the RTI regime.
This judicial reinforcement of the right to information assumes particular significance amidst allegations from the opposition regarding the purported erosion of the RTI framework by the government. Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, in a statement made in August 2023, lamented the gradual dismantling of the RTI Act, decrying it as an assault on constitutional rights and a perilous step towards undermining democracy.
Moreover, today's ruling by the Supreme Court serves as a timely reaffirmation of citizens' entitlement to transparency in political funding. By ordering the disclosure of crucial information regarding corporate contributors through electoral bonds, the court has underscored the imperative of ensuring accountability and thwarting any attempts at quid pro quo arrangements.
The Supreme Court's directive to the State Bank of India to furnish detailed information regarding donations made through electoral bonds, including the identities of donors and the recipient political parties, further underscores its commitment to transparency. This information, mandated to be published by the Election Commission of India, holds the promise of empowering citizens with crucial insights into the dynamics of political financing.
In essence, today's verdict represents a significant milestone in upholding the principles of transparency and accountability in political funding, thereby fortifying the foundations of democracy and citizens' rights to know.
Â
