The recent protest by Tamil Nadu's ruling party, DMK, against Prime Minister Narendra Modi's remarks regarding the missing keys of the Puri Jagannath Temple's treasure room highlights the sensitivity surrounding inter-state relations and political rhetoric.
PM Modi's statement at an election rally in Odisha, suggesting that the keys were sent to Tamil Nadu six years ago, drew sharp criticism from the DMK, which condemned the remarks and tore posters of the Prime Minister during their protest.
Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin also weighed in, condemning PM Modi's speech and accusing him of portraying Tamizhar as thieves of the Puri Jagannath temple treasure. Stalin emphasized the need for the Prime Minister to uphold the dignity of his position and refrain from making divisive statements for electoral gains.
In response, BJP state president K Annamalai defended PM Modi's comments, arguing that they were directed at VK Pandian, a Tamilian who holds significant influence in Odisha politics as a close aide to Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik. Annamalai asserted that PM Modi was highlighting the issue of non-Odia officials wielding power in Odisha's governance.
Annamalai further clarified that PM Modi's statement was not intended to vilify Tamizhar but rather to address the governance dynamics in Odisha, where VK Pandian's role has been questioned. He emphasized the BJP's commitment to addressing the issue of the missing keys once in power.
The controversy underscores the complex interplay between regional politics, identity, and governance issues, highlighting the need for careful consideration of language and context in political discourse.
