The recent verdict in Hong Kong's landmark subversion trial has drawn significant international attention and condemnation. Fourteen pro-democracy activists were found guilty, while two were acquitted, in a trial that critics argue could further undermine the city's rule of law and its reputation as a global financial hub.
The trial, which is Hong Kong's largest against the democratic opposition, stems from the arrest of 47 democrats more than three years ago. The defendants were charged with conspiracy to commit subversion under China's national security law, which was imposed on Hong Kong.
The verdicts have sparked criticism from the United States and other countries, with calls for the immediate release of the accused. Diplomats from several nations, including the U.S. and the European Union, attended the hearing, underscoring the international interest in the case.
The accused face the possibility of significant prison terms, with sentencing scheduled for a later date. Some defendants have already pleaded guilty, while others have become prosecution witnesses.
The trial has been characterized by tight security measures and strong public interest, with supporters queuing overnight to attend the proceedings. The defendants are accused of plotting to destabilize the government and force the resignation of Hong Kong's leader through a pre-selection ballot in a citywide election.
While the verdicts have been met with disappointment and concern from pro-democracy activists and human rights organizations, Beijing maintains that the national security law has brought stability to Hong Kong and respects human rights.
The trial represents a significant escalation in the crackdown on dissent in Hong Kong, following the imposition of the national security law in 2020. The conviction of pro-democracy activists has raised fears of further erosion of civil liberties and political freedoms in the city.
