The ongoing investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into the brutal rape and murder of a 31-year-old trainee doctor at Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital has taken a significant turn. Thus far, the probe has pointed to the involvement of only one individual, Sanjoy Roy, a civic volunteer associated with the Kolkata Police. Roy was arrested on August 10, just one day after the semi-nude body of the doctor was found in a seminar hall of the hospital, sparking outrage and concern across the country.
Forensic evidence and DNA reports have been pivotal in shaping the direction of the investigation. According to sources, these reports strongly suggest that Roy was the sole perpetrator of this heinous crime, which contradicts earlier speculations and allegations of a possible gang-rape. The forensic findings reveal that Roy not only raped but also killed the doctor, a revelation that has shocked many given the initial theories that multiple assailants might have been involved.
Roy's connection to the crime was further established through CCTV footage that captured him entering the building where the doctor's body was later discovered. Additionally, the recovery of Roy’s Bluetooth headset at the crime scene provided crucial physical evidence linking him directly to the incident. His history of domestic abuse and his unrestricted access to various hospital departments have also been highlighted as factors that might have facilitated the crime.
Despite these developments, the CBI has not yet closed the case on the possibility of other individuals being involved. The agency is considering sending the forensic reports to independent experts for further verification and a final opinion. This move indicates the CBI's cautious approach, ensuring that all aspects of the crime are thoroughly examined before drawing definitive conclusions.
The case has been marked by controversy, with differing interpretations of the forensic evidence fueling debates. A doctor had earlier claimed that the victim might have been gang-raped, pointing to a finding of "151 mg of liquid" in the vaginal swab test as evidence. This assertion, along with the victim’s parents' allegations of the presence of a significant amount of semen in her body, suggested to them that multiple perpetrators were involved. These claims were bolstered by the belief that the extent of the injuries could not have been inflicted by a single individual.
However, these assertions were challenged by Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra, who referred to the autopsy report, which was conducted in the presence of a judicial magistrate and three doctors. According to Moitra, the report did not indicate any fractures to the pelvic girdle or other bones, which would be more consistent with an assault by multiple individuals. She clarified that the 150 grams mentioned in the report referred to the weight of the inner and outer genitalia, not to any fluid, thus dismissing the gang rape theory. Moitra emphasized that fluids are measured in milliliters, not grams, and the autopsy findings did not support the presence of multiple assailants.
As the investigation continues, the case remains under intense public scrutiny, with many awaiting the final conclusions of the CBI. The agency’s findings so far have provided some clarity but have also left certain questions unanswered, particularly regarding the initial allegations of gang rape. The resolution of this case is critical, not only for delivering justice to the victim and her family but also for restoring public trust in the investigative process and the institutions involved. The case has undeniably highlighted the complexities and challenges of criminal investigations, especially in cases that provoke widespread emotional and social reactions.
Â
