The Indian Ex-Services League (IESL), a collective of military veterans, has recently made headlines by addressing a strongly worded letter to the Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) and the heads of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. This correspondence raises serious concerns regarding the alarming trend of violence directed at serving military personnel and their families, culminating in a demand for accountability from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah. The veterans express dismay over what they perceive as a disturbing silence from top leadership, particularly in light of a recent incident involving the fiancée of an Army officer in Odisha.
Dated September 24, the letter specifically highlights the assault on Brigadier A. Pradhan's daughter, which has become a focal point for the broader frustrations among military families. The incident occurred when the woman and her fiancé, who is also a serving officer, were attempting to file a complaint at the Bharatpur Police Station after being waylaid by miscreants on September 15. This assault, coupled with the lack of visible support from government leadership, has galvanized the veterans’ concerns.
The veterans acknowledged the media engagement from the General Officer Commanding (GOC) of the Madhya Bharat area but lamented the absence of a response from Prime Minister Modi and Home Minister Shah. They pointed out a perceived disparity in governmental reactions to violence, noting that incidents occurring in opposition-ruled states seem to attract far greater attention and urgency than those affecting military personnel in states governed by the ruling party. This inconsistency underscores a troubling narrative: while certain high-profile cases, such as that of a trainee doctor in West Bengal, ignite national outrage and political mobilization, similar incidents in Odisha and other regions have been met with silence.
In their letter, the veterans underscored the critical importance of military ethos, respect for rank, and service, criticizing the military leadership for what they describe as a passive response to these escalating issues. They pointed out the need for a two-way communication channel between veterans and military leaders, suggesting the establishment of a WhatsApp line to facilitate direct dialogue. This proposal reflects a growing divide between the ranks and military leadership, illustrating veterans' desires for their voices to be heard regarding pressing matters affecting their community.
Moreover, the letter delves into the politicization of military promotions, expressing concern about how the current political climate influences military leadership decisions. The veterans warned that the ongoing theatre command reforms, which could result in the creation of four new four-star generals, may lead to further complications and potential inaction regarding vital issues facing military personnel and their families.
Historical references in the letter evoke instances where military personnel took a strong stand against civilian misconduct, highlighting a perceived decline in such assertiveness in contemporary contexts. They referenced the past incident involving Surinder Singh Kairon, son of a former Punjab Chief Minister, who faced repercussions for his misconduct towards an Army officer’s wife. The veterans implied that had the recent assault taken place in a region with a significant military presence, the response from both the military and governmental authorities would have been far more vigorous.
The letter concludes with a pointed and challenging question to the military leadership: will they honor the sacrifices made by veterans and their families by addressing these urgent issues with the Prime Minister? This candid communication has sparked significant conversations within military circles and the broader community, raising critical questions about the treatment of serving personnel, veterans, and their families in India's evolving political landscape.
The veterans' discontent reflects a larger concern about the respect and protection afforded to those who have served the nation, emphasizing that silence from the highest echelons of power is not an option when it comes to addressing violence against military families. As this issue gains traction, it will be crucial to monitor the responses from both military leadership and government officials, as their actions (or lack thereof) may shape the future dynamics of civil-military relations in India.
Â
