Arvind Kejriwal's decision to resign as Chief Minister of Delhi is a strategic political maneuver designed to address several challenges while positioning himself advantageously ahead of the upcoming elections. With the Delhi Assembly elections originally slated for February 2025, Kejriwal’s resignation comes at a time when the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) faces a mix of corruption allegations, anti-incumbency, and pressure from the opposition. By stepping down, Kejriwal not only attempts to reset the political landscape but also creates an opportunity for AAP to regain public trust and strengthen its electoral position.
One of the key motivations behind this move is the limited time left before the scheduled elections. With just a few months remaining, Kejriwal's resignation allows him to call for early elections, potentially in November 2024, which would coincide with elections in other states like Maharashtra and Jharkhand. This timing could work to his advantage, as it enables AAP to ride the wave of anti-BJP sentiment that is growing in these states. By aligning the Delhi elections with these larger national contests, Kejriwal aims to amplify his party's campaign narrative, tapping into broader opposition momentum against the BJP. Even if elections are held in February as planned, Kejriwal’s early exit may create a brief interlude with a new Chief Minister, allowing AAP to position itself as a refreshed and reinvigorated party under his guidance.
Another important factor in Kejriwal's resignation is the ongoing corruption allegations surrounding his party, particularly related to the excise policy case. Kejriwal and his former Deputy Chief Minister, Manish Sisodia, have been at the center of these accusations, which have been used by their opponents to paint the AAP as corrupt. Stepping down from his position allows Kejriwal to distance himself from these allegations and reset his party’s image as one committed to honesty and transparency. By framing his resignation as an "agnipariksha" or trial by fire, he seeks to position himself as a leader willing to face the public's judgment rather than clinging to power under a cloud of corruption. This could help garner public sympathy and reinforce his narrative of fighting against what he and his party have termed "vendetta politics" by the BJP-led central government.
Kejriwal's long tenure as Chief Minister, which began in December 2013, has made him vulnerable to the forces of anti-incumbency. After nearly a decade in power, even a popular leader faces the challenge of voter fatigue and dissatisfaction. By resigning and seeking a fresh mandate, Kejriwal is attempting to beat anti-incumbency by presenting himself as a candidate for change rather than a continuation of the status quo. This move allows him to reset the political clock on his tenure and campaign on the achievements of his government, while also introducing a fresh face as Chief Minister, at least temporarily. This strategy could enable AAP to consolidate its base while avoiding the pitfalls of being seen as a stagnant administration.
Kejriwal’s resignation also reflects his acute awareness of the national political climate. In states like Maharashtra and Jharkhand, where elections are due around the same time, there is growing discontent against the BJP. The BJP-led government in Maharashtra, for example, has faced backlash over issues like the Maratha reservation and internal discord within the ruling alliance. Similarly, in Jharkhand, the BJP is struggling to wrest control from the ruling Mahagathbandhan. By aligning the Delhi elections with these states, Kejriwal seeks to tap into this anti-BJP sentiment and present himself as a leader who can challenge the central government’s dominance. The coordinated opposition narratives in these states could create a larger national conversation, helping AAP build a stronger opposition narrative in Delhi.
A major concern for Kejriwal has been the threat of central rule in Delhi. During his time in jail, BJP leaders had called for the imposition of the President’s rule, citing the AAP government’s inability to function effectively in his absence. By resigning voluntarily, Kejriwal preempts this possibility and keeps control of the political timeline in Delhi. The imposition of central rule could have delayed the elections by up to six months, which would have worked against AAP’s interests. Moreover, continuing as Chief Minister under the strict bail conditions imposed by the Supreme Court would have limited Kejriwal’s ability to govern effectively. By stepping down, he avoids these complications and ensures that AAP remains in control of its political fate.
In announcing his resignation, Kejriwal has not only avoided the immediate threat of central rule but has also set the stage for AAP’s next move. His decision signals that he is willing to face the public directly, seeking a fresh mandate rather than remaining in power under legal and political pressure. This narrative of seeking "justice from the people" positions him as a leader who is confident in his public support and willing to put his fate in the hands of voters. At the same time, Kejriwal’s resignation allows AAP to project itself as a party that is not afraid to make difficult decisions and confront allegations head-on.
By taking this bold step, Kejriwal has turned a potentially damaging situation into a political opportunity. His resignation is not just about stepping down from power; it is a carefully calculated move to reshape the narrative, galvanize his supporters, and prepare for the next electoral battle. In doing so, he has once again demonstrated his ability to play political chess, positioning himself and his party for what could be a critical moment in Delhi’s political landscape. Whether this move will pay off remains to be seen, but it is clear that Kejriwal is aiming to turn the upcoming elections into a referendum not just on his leadership, but on the future direction of the AAP and its place in Indian politics.
Â
