Sharad Pawar has intensified his legal battle against Ajit Pawar by filing a fresh plea in the Supreme Court, seeking to prevent the latter from using the Nationalist Congress Party’s (NCP) iconic "Clock" symbol in the upcoming Maharashtra Assembly elections. This development follows the internal rift within the party, with Ajit Pawar leading a faction that has claimed authority over the NCP. However, Sharad Pawar, the party’s founding leader, argues that the "Clock" symbol is an integral part of the NCP's identity and should not be used by Ajit Pawar's faction, as it could lead to confusion among the electorate.
In his plea, Sharad Pawar points out the significant association between the "Clock" symbol and the NCP, dating back to the party’s formation over two decades ago. He notes that the symbol has become synonymous with his leadership and the party's core values, making it a crucial element in ensuring that voters can clearly identify the original NCP faction led by him. The petition underscores that Ajit Pawar, having broken away from the party, should not be allowed to retain the symbol, as this could mislead voters who may not be fully aware of the split.
The plea further emphasizes the importance of maintaining transparency and fairness in the electoral process, arguing that Ajit Pawar should apply for a new election symbol. Sharad Pawar’s legal team has highlighted examples of voter confusion that occurred during previous elections, where similar symbols were used by different factions of a party. In this context, Sharad Pawar warns that the upcoming state assembly elections, with smaller constituencies and a highly competitive environment, could see greater manipulation of voter perception if the symbol issue is not resolved.
Sharad Pawar also refers to the Election Commission of India’s decision to temporarily grant him the "Man Blowing a Turha" symbol for the parliamentary elections. This move was seen as a stopgap measure while the dispute over the NCP's original symbol is being resolved. In his petition, Pawar argues that this temporary symbol cannot replace the years of political recognition and goodwill that the "Clock" symbol represents for his faction. He stresses that Ajit Pawar’s faction, if allowed to use the "Clock" symbol, would unfairly benefit from this political legacy.
Additionally, Sharad Pawar’s legal plea raises concerns about the potential for manipulation and bad-faith tactics in the elections. He asserts that voters, particularly those in rural or less politically informed constituencies, may not fully understand the internal dynamics of the NCP split. As a result, they might inadvertently cast their votes for Ajit Pawar’s faction, believing it to be the original NCP under Sharad Pawar’s leadership.
The case is now set to be heard by the Supreme Court on October 15, and its outcome could have far-reaching consequences for both factions of the NCP. A decision in Sharad Pawar’s favor could force Ajit Pawar to establish a new visual identity for his faction, potentially weakening his electoral appeal. Conversely, if Ajit Pawar can retain the symbol, it could give his faction a significant advantage, leveraging the established political recognition of the "Clock" symbol to garner support.
As the case moves forward, political analysts and party members alike are closely watching the developments, as the ruling will not only affect the NCP’s internal power dynamics but could also set a precedent for future disputes over election symbols. Sharad Pawar remains steadfast in his belief that the integrity of the electoral process is at stake, while Ajit Pawar's camp has argued that the symbol should represent the faction that commands the majority support within the party.
With both factions gearing up for a critical election battle in Maharashtra, the upcoming Supreme Court ruling could be a decisive factor in shaping the political landscape of the state. The verdict will likely influence voter perceptions, party strategies, and the broader contest between the two rival Pawar factions, both of which are vying for control over the future of the NCP.
Â
