Pearl Kapur, the ambitious founder of Zyber 365 Technologies, portrays himself on his Instagram profile as "India's youngest billionaire," a moniker he fully embraces. This claim, however, has sparked significant skepticism and scrutiny, particularly regarding the legitimacy and transparency of his company’s astonishing rise to fame. The rapid ascent of Zyber 365, which markets itself as a Web 3.0 and AI startup, raises numerous questions about its authenticity and the credibility of its financial claims.
The narrative surrounding Zyber 365 is nothing short of remarkable. Founded on July 20, 2023, the company swiftly declared itself a unicorn after allegedly securing a staggering $100 million in Series A funding. This funding propelled its valuation to an astonishing $1.2 billion, a figure that has elicited both excitement and disbelief in equal measure. For a company that had been virtually unknown just weeks prior, this rapid declaration of unicorn status seemed overly ambitious and raised eyebrows among industry observers. Zyber 365 boldly proclaimed itself to be "India and Asia’s fastest unicorn" and "India’s 109th unicorn," igniting a wave of enthusiasm within the Indian startup ecosystem. Unicorn status typically attracts further investor interest, but the legitimacy of Zyber 365's claims has become a topic of heated debate.
A closer examination of publicly available documents reveals a concerning lack of transparency regarding the company's actual operations and financial health. Zyber 365’s registered capital is surprisingly modest, with authorized capital set at merely Rs 15 lakh and a paid-up capital of just Rs 1 lakh. These figures raise significant questions about the company's financial foundation. The Indian headquarters are listed at an unremarkable location in Hoshiarpur, Punjab, with additional offices reportedly situated in Sahibzada Ajit Singh Nagar and Ahmedabad, Gujarat. Notably, according to the company’s own website, its global headquarters is supposedly based in London, which raises further questions about its operational footprint and global ambitions.
The corporate structure of Zyber 365 is also worth scrutinizing. The company lists three directors: Pearl Kapur, who identifies as Pearlpreet Singh Kapur and holds the title of Founder & Chairman; Sunny Piyushkumar Vaghela, a co-founder and Chief Information Officer; and a third director, Surdas Puthem, who joined the board in September 2023. However, Vaghela has publicly clarified that he is no longer associated with the company. He noted that while his resignation has not yet been processed, he submitted the necessary DIR-11 form to formalize his departure, which raises additional concerns about the company’s internal management and stability. The ongoing presence of Vaghela’s name on official documents despite his resignation adds another layer of confusion and potential misrepresentation to the narrative surrounding Zyber 365.
Despite claiming to have secured this monumental investment, Zyber 365 has not filed any financial reports with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, a fact that has only fueled skepticism regarding its operations. The lack of transparency is particularly troubling when it comes to the company’s alleged funding from SRAM & MRAM Group, which supposedly led Zyber’s funding round. SRAM & MRAM, chaired by Sailesh Lachu Hiranandani, has made headlines for claiming substantial investments in India, including a $3.64 billion semiconductor fabrication plant and a $100 million investment in SpiceXpress, the cargo division of SpiceJet. However, reports indicate that over 16 months later, no funds from SRAM & MRAM have materialized into these ventures, casting significant doubt on their financial claims. SpiceJet has confirmed, in a brief statement, that no investment has been made by SRAM & MRAM, despite earlier press releases announcing a partnership.
The cloud of doubt surrounding Zyber 365’s funding continues to grow. According to reports, neither Kapur nor Hiranandani have provided additional details or proof of the promised investment. Repeated requests for clarification from both Zyber 365 and SRAM & MRAM have gone unanswered, leaving the public—and potential investors—wondering if Zyber 365’s unicorn status is built on solid ground or is merely an elaborate façade.
Despite the opaque financials, Kapur remains actively engaged on social media, using platforms like Instagram to bolster his public persona. He continues to project an image of success, confidently asserting his status as "India's youngest billionaire." Yet, the reality behind Zyber 365’s foundations remains shrouded in uncertainty, and the dissonance between his public persona and the underlying questions about his company’s legitimacy is striking.Â
Zyber 365’s story serves as a microcosm of a larger narrative about India’s startup ecosystem, where unicorns are celebrated and lauded, often without the rigorous scrutiny they deserve. In a country where the economy is booming and the technology sector is drawing significant foreign investment, the hype surrounding startups has sometimes overshadowed the necessity for due diligence and transparent business practices. Companies like Zyber 365 seem to be riding this wave of excitement, boldly claiming unicorn status while failing to deliver on their promises or substantiate their claims with verifiable evidence.
The fate of Zyber 365 remains uncertain, shrouded in a mix of ambition and skepticism. Will this self-proclaimed billionaire and his startup be able to live up to the extraordinary hype they have created, or is it all merely a sophisticated mirage? As questions continue to swirl around the company’s credibility, the future of Zyber 365 will hinge on its ability to transform its ambitious claims into tangible results. Investors and industry observers are watching closely, eager to see whether Zyber 365 can emerge from the shadow of doubt and prove its worth in an increasingly competitive landscape. The outcome may serve as a critical lesson for the broader startup ecosystem in India, underscoring the importance of transparency, accountability, and the necessity of grounding lofty claims in reality.
Â
