India Today's Preeti Choudhry breaks down the reasons behind the Congress party's surprising defeat in the Haryana Assembly elections, despite widespread predictions that it would reclaim power. The BJP, which had faced significant anti-incumbency after a decade of rule, managed to win 48 seats, while the Congress fell short with just 37 seats, a major blow to the party’s aspirations. The loss has sparked an internal debate within Congress and the wider opposition INDIA bloc, with many pointing fingers at missteps in strategy, leadership, and campaign execution.
One of the central reasons for Congress's defeat was its sense of overconfidence. After a strong showing in the Lok Sabha elections, where the party won 99 seats, Congress leaders assumed that the public would naturally gravitate toward them, especially given the dissatisfaction with the BJP’s long tenure in power. This overconfidence led the party to overlook key aspects of the campaign, including the rising influence of independent candidates and rebel leaders who contested against official Congress candidates. These independents siphoned off crucial votes in tight constituencies, contributing significantly to Congress's losses.
A significant factor was Congress's refusal to accommodate potential allies, which proved to be a critical misstep. The Samajwadi Party had shown interest in contesting seats in Haryana’s Ahirwal belt, a region where they felt they had an opportunity to make inroads, while the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) had sought to contest five urban seats. However, Congress, confident in its ability to win alone, rejected these overtures, resulting in both parties going their separate ways. The AAP, in particular, contested 88 seats independently but failed to secure any wins, further fragmenting the opposition vote and weakening Congress’s chances. The inability to form a united front against the BJP ultimately undermined Congress’s electoral prospects.
The internal dynamics of the Congress party in Haryana were also a major contributor to its defeat. Bhupinder Hooda, a former Chief Minister of Haryana, played a dominant role in the campaign, with the party relying heavily on his leadership and influence within the Jat community. However, this over-reliance on Hooda alienated other factions within the party, particularly those aligned with Sirsa MP Kumari Selja. This factionalism created a rift within the party, preventing it from mounting a unified campaign against the BJP. The infighting also affected the distribution of tickets, with many Congress leaders expressing dissatisfaction with the choices made. The emphasis on Hooda’s leadership and the Jat community led to a polarization of voters along caste lines, with the BJP capitalizing on the support of OBC voters, who make up 40% of the electorate, compared to the Jat community’s 22-25%.
The Congress’s campaign was further hindered by its failure to connect with voters on local issues. Instead of focusing on the specific challenges faced by Haryana’s electorate, Congress leaders framed the election within a broader national context, attempting to link the state elections to larger national issues. This strategy, however, did not resonate with voters who were more concerned with local governance, development, and economic issues. By trying to "nationalize" the election, Congress failed to address the specific needs and concerns of Haryana’s voters, allowing the BJP to position itself as a party focused on state-level governance and progress.
Another critical miscalculation was Congress’s handling of the Jat versus non-Jat dynamic in Haryana. While Bhupinder Hooda's influence among the Jat community was significant, Congress overplayed its reliance on this demographic. This move led to a backlash among non-Jat voters, particularly the OBCs, who saw Congress’s focus on Jats as exclusionary. The BJP effectively exploited this sentiment, consolidating support from OBCs and other non-Jat communities, further weakening Congress’s base.
In the aftermath of the election, there has been significant blame-shifting within the Congress party and the wider opposition bloc. Many allies within the INDIA bloc have criticized Congress for its arrogant approach to alliances, accusing the party of assuming that it could win the election single-handedly without the support of regional parties. This overconfidence, they argue, was a key factor in Congress's failure to build a broad-based coalition capable of challenging the BJP’s well-organized campaign machinery.
The BJP, meanwhile, benefited from a well-executed campaign that focused on both governance and identity politics. By consolidating its base among OBCs and non-Jats, and by maintaining a disciplined and unified approach to the election, the BJP was able to overcome the challenges posed by anti-incumbency. The party also capitalized on the disarray within Congress, presenting itself as a stable and cohesive force in contrast to the factionalism and internal strife that plagued the opposition.
In conclusion, Congress's unexpected defeat in the Haryana Assembly elections can be attributed to a combination of overconfidence, poor strategic decisions, internal factionalism, and a failure to connect with local voters. By relying too heavily on Bhupinder Hooda and the Jat vote, alienating potential allies, and misreading the electoral landscape, Congress squandered a prime opportunity to unseat the BJP. The BJP, despite facing anti-incumbency, ran a smarter, more disciplined campaign, allowing it to secure an unprecedented third term in power. The outcome has left Congress in a state of introspection, with calls for a reassessment of its strategy and leadership as it prepares for future electoral battles.
Â
