Mumbai's Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport was thrown into a state of high alert on Wednesday afternoon following a bomb threat from an anonymous caller. The unidentified individual contacted the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) control room, alleging a plot to detonate a bomb at the airport. The caller specifically mentioned a person named Mohammad, who was supposedly carrying explosives on a flight scheduled to depart from Mumbai to Azerbaijan.
The CISF responded promptly, notifying the Sahar Police, which led to an immediate and coordinated security operation at the airport. Authorities increased surveillance across all terminals, deploying additional personnel and using specialized equipment to conduct detailed searches. Every part of the airport, from luggage to passenger areas, underwent a thorough inspection to ensure the safety of travelers and staff. The scare disrupted routine airport operations, with many passengers experiencing delays as security protocols were strictly enforced.
This incident is part of a growing trend of threats targeting airports and airlines across India, contributing to a heightened sense of unease among travelers. In October alone, the country witnessed over 450 hoax calls related to bomb threats. These incidents have led to concerns about their impact on public safety, national security, and the possible disruption of air travel. Given the potential for real threats amidst the noise of false alarms, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) has stepped up its nationwide security measures. The NIA's cyber division has been tasked with tracing the origin of these calls, particularly those believed to come from abroad, to determine if there is a coordinated effort to spread panic or disrupt airport operations.
As part of its investigative efforts, the NIA is using advanced technology to track the digital footprint of hoax callers. This involves not only identifying and locating perpetrators but also understanding whether these calls are connected to any broader agenda. Analysts are scrutinizing patterns in the calls to see if they coincide with specific political or social events, suggesting a more organized attempt to generate fear.Â
In response to the surge in false threats, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has issued a stringent advisory to social media platforms, directing them to comply with the country's Information Technology (IT) Rules and the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita (BNS). The advisory stresses the importance of these platforms acting swiftly to remove any posts containing bomb threats or risk facing legal consequences. This measure highlights the government's strategy to prevent hoaxes from spreading online and fueling public anxiety, emphasizing the responsibility of tech companies in curbing the dissemination of malicious content.
Despite the fact that these bomb threats often turn out to be false, each one necessitates a full-scale security response, draining resources and causing disruptions to passengers and airlines alike. Mumbai’s airport, one of the busiest in India, faces particular challenges due to its high volume of international and domestic flights. Flight schedules can be severely impacted as authorities carry out rigorous checks, leading to travel delays and frustrations. Such incidents not only strain airport security personnel but also underscore the critical need for coordination between airport authorities, local law enforcement, and national agencies.
As the holiday season approaches, when air travel tends to peak, the aviation sector is bracing for the possibility of more threats. The rise in such incidents has prompted airlines to issue advisories and take preventive steps. For instance, IndiGo, one of India’s major carriers, released a notice on its social media platforms, cautioning passengers about potential delays due to security measures. Other airlines are expected to follow suit, advising travelers to stay informed about their flight statuses and to arrive at airports earlier than usual to accommodate additional security screenings.
The recurring threats have also sparked political controversy, with parties pointing fingers at each other for the lack of preventive measures. Some leaders have called for stricter penalties for those behind the hoax calls, suggesting that heavier fines and longer prison sentences could deter would-be perpetrators. Others argue that the focus should be on improving intelligence-gathering capabilities and investing in more sophisticated surveillance technology to identify threats before they escalate.
This particular incident has renewed debates about the balance between security and convenience, raising questions about how best to handle the increasing volume of hoax threats without causing widespread panic or unnecessary disruption. Many experts advocate for enhanced public awareness campaigns, urging citizens to remain vigilant and report any suspicious behavior while avoiding the spread of unverified information.
Â
