Infosys co-founder N Narayana Murthy has once again sparked debate over his long-held belief that hard work is the key to India’s progress. In his recent remarks at the CNBC Global Leadership Summit, Murthy remained resolute about the idea of a six-day workweek, a suggestion that has drawn both sharp criticism and some support across various circles. Despite facing backlash, particularly on social media, he reiterated that he is unwavering in his perspective, stating, “I will take this with me to my grave.” For Murthy, a strong work ethic is not merely an individual pursuit but a collective responsibility crucial for India to compete globally and enhance its stature as a rising economic power.
The veteran business leader’s comments bring into question the country's decision to transition from a six-day workweek to a five-day workweek back in 1986, a move that Murthy has openly opposed. He believes that reducing the workweek has had a negative impact on productivity and overall economic development. To bolster his argument, he cited Prime Minister Narendra Modi as an example of tireless dedication, commending Modi's relentless work habits as a benchmark for the kind of effort needed to drive national progress. According to Murthy, PM Modi’s long hours are a testament to the level of commitment that should be embraced by citizens, particularly those in the workforce. He framed it as an obligation to match the Prime Minister's efforts to honor the progress happening in the country.
Murthy’s endorsement of a six-day workweek reflects his own work philosophy, which has shaped his illustrious career. He has often shared anecdotes about his rigorous schedule, detailing how he regularly worked up to 14-hour days, six and a half days a week, during the foundational years of Infosys. For Murthy, these long hours were not a sacrifice but a duty—an integral part of the journey to building one of India’s most successful tech companies. He described his work ethic as a form of gratitude, particularly because he and many others had access to subsidized education in India, a privilege he believes should be honored through hard work and dedication.
Murthy's stance has reignited a larger conversation about work-life balance, generational differences, and the evolving expectations of modern employees. His suggestion earlier this year for Indian millennials to adopt a 70-hour workweek led to a storm of criticism. Many pointed out that such a grueling schedule could lead to increased stress, health issues, and a lack of personal fulfillment, particularly for a generation that has become more vocal about the importance of mental well-being and work-life integration. Some argue that Murthy’s perspective is outdated, rooted in a traditional view of career success that may not align with the values of today’s workforce. Others, however, see his call for longer work hours as a necessary reality check for a nation still striving to make its mark on the global stage.
Despite the criticism, Murthy remains steadfast. He has repeatedly emphasized that there is no shortcut to success, regardless of one’s intelligence or natural talent. “There is no substitute for hard work,” he declared, dismissing any notion that innate ability could replace dedication. For him, the only path to meaningful achievement—whether in business, technology, or national development—is through consistent and focused effort. This belief is deeply rooted in his own experiences and observations, particularly in how countries like Germany and Japan rebuilt their economies from the ashes of World War II. Murthy points to these nations as examples of what can be accomplished when a society commits itself to a culture of hard work, discipline, and perseverance.
Murthy’s views also tap into a broader debate about productivity and work culture in India. On one side, there are advocates who argue that a rigorous work schedule is essential for India to compete with economies like China and the United States, both of which have demonstrated significant growth due to strong work ethics and industrial output. These supporters claim that, for India to bridge the economic gap with developed nations, a return to longer workweeks and a more intense work culture might be necessary. They see Murthy’s stance as a call to action for Indian professionals to raise their standards and align with global expectations of productivity and performance.
On the other side of the debate are those who stress the importance of holistic well-being, pointing to the benefits of a balanced work-life approach that includes adequate time for family, rest, and personal growth. They argue that excessive work hours can lead to burnout, decreased job satisfaction, and ultimately, a decline in productivity. In this view, promoting mental health, encouraging leisure, and nurturing creativity are seen as equally important components of a healthy economy. These critics see Murthy’s endorsement of a six-day workweek as potentially counterproductive, particularly in a time when many companies are embracing flexible schedules, remote work, and the four-day workweek to attract and retain talent.
Murthy’s comments come at a pivotal moment, as India grapples with rapid technological advancements, the rise of the gig economy, and shifting cultural expectations. The debate is not merely about the number of hours one works but touches on deeper issues of identity, ambition, and the country’s vision for the future. Can India, with its rich cultural heritage and diverse workforce, carve out a path that balances traditional values of hard work with modern demands for flexibility and well-being?
Moreover, Murthy’s advocacy for a strong work ethic reflects broader questions about national identity and pride. He has often spoken about the role of educated individuals in India, emphasizing that those who have benefited from the country's resources have a moral obligation to give back through their labor and contributions. For Murthy, India's future depends on its citizens' willingness to put in the effort needed to rise above challenges and seize opportunities in an increasingly competitive world.
This generational divide highlights how perceptions of success are evolving. The older generation, represented by figures like Murthy, associates success with sacrifice, long hours, and an unyielding drive. In contrast, the younger generation values autonomy, creativity, and a healthier balance between work and personal life. This dichotomy underscores the ongoing transformation of India's work culture, as it seeks to find a balance between respecting traditional values and embracing modernity.
As India continues to grow as an economic powerhouse, these debates are unlikely to be resolved quickly. Murthy’s statements will continue to provoke conversation and reflection, challenging both individuals and policymakers to think critically about what it means to work hard in the 21st century. His views may be divisive, but they undoubtedly play a role in shaping the discourse around productivity, ambition, and the future of work in a country poised to play a major role in the global economy. Whether one agrees with him or not, Murthy’s unwavering commitment to a strong work ethic is a reminder that the path to success is seldom easy and that the choices a nation makes about work can have long-lasting implications for its prosperity and well-being.
