IIT Madras Director V Kamakoti’s comments on the purported benefits of cow urine sparked widespread debate, with reactions ranging from support to severe criticism. Speaking at the ‘Go Samrakshana Sala’ event in Chennai on January 15, which coincided with Maatu Pongal celebrations, Kamakoti defended his stance, asserting that the benefits of cow urine are scientifically validated. "I will forward five research papers done in America to you all, where it’s scientifically proven that cow urine has beneficial elements. It’s justified scientifically," he said while addressing the media at an event related to the space program.
During the event, Kamakoti also highlighted the significance of organic farming and the indispensable role of indigenous cows in agriculture and the economy. However, his remarks quickly became a focal point for controversy, drawing sharp criticism from several political and nationalist groups.
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader TKS Elangovan lambasted the remarks, accusing the central government of attempting to "ruin" the education system by encouraging pseudoscientific beliefs. Similarly, Congress leader Karti Chidambaram criticized Kamakoti via Twitter, accusing him of "peddling pseudoscience." Dr. GR Ravindranath of the Doctors Association for Social Equality warned that consuming cow urine could lead to bacterial infections, calling the claim unscientific and harmful.
Adding to the opposition, Kali Poongundran of the rationalist group Dravidar Kazhagam deemed the statement "shameful" and “regressive,” citing studies that found cow urine contained harmful bacteria and was unfit for human consumption. Thanthai Periyar Dravidar Kazhagam leader K Ramakrishnan demanded that Kamakoti either provide concrete evidence for his claims or issue a public apology. He also warned of protests if the IIT director failed to clarify his remarks.
Amid the uproar, Tamil Nadu BJP chief K Annamalai came to Kamakoti’s defense, arguing that the remarks were being unnecessarily politicized. Annamalai pointed out that Kamakoti’s statements reflected personal views, not institutional advice or advocacy. He further praised Kamakoti’s professional achievements, emphasizing his contributions to academia and research, and accused the DMK of leveraging the issue for political gains.
This controversy sheds light on the ongoing friction between advocates of traditional practices and rationalist groups, particularly in Tamil Nadu, where scientific temper and anti-superstition movements hold significant influence. While Kamakoti has yet to elaborate further or provide the studies he referred to, the debate continues to draw attention, highlighting the complexities of balancing traditional beliefs with scientific scrutiny in modern discourse.
