Donald Trump, the 47th President of the United States, has sparked intense debates with his decision to sign a series of executive orders shortly after returning to office, including one that specifically targets the longstanding practice of birthright citizenship. This executive order aims to revoke the automatic U.S. citizenship granted to children born in the country to non-citizen parents, a move that has raised significant legal and social concerns across the United States. Birthright citizenship, a fundamental aspect of U.S. immigration policy since the ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868, ensures that anyone born on American soil automatically acquires U.S. citizenship, regardless of the citizenship or immigration status of their parents.
The executive order signed by President Trump makes it clear that children born in the U.S. will only be granted citizenship if at least one of their parents is a U.S. citizen, a legal permanent resident (green card holder), or a member of the U.S. military. Trump’s administration argues that this change is necessary to curb illegal immigration, which they claim has been exacerbated by the existing birthright citizenship provision. The official statement from Trump’s office emphasized that the federal government would no longer automatically recognize the citizenship of children born to illegal aliens in the U.S., and the administration would step up efforts to enhance vetting and screening for illegal aliens.
In his inaugural address, President Trump further stated his intention to immediately halt illegal entry into the country and to begin deporting millions of undocumented immigrants. This push aligns with Trump’s broader vision to clamp down on illegal immigration and what he describes as "uncontrolled" borders. The new policy aims to prevent the exploitation of the birthright citizenship system by individuals coming to the U.S. to give birth to children with the intent of securing U.S. citizenship for them. While Trump’s administration defends this move as a necessary step to address illegal immigration, critics argue that it may have broader, unintended consequences on immigrant communities and U.S. society as a whole.
Birthright citizenship, rooted in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, has been a cornerstone of American law for more than 150 years. This provision was originally intended to ensure that all persons born in the U.S., including formerly enslaved Black people, were granted citizenship and full legal rights, marking a significant step toward racial equality after the Civil War. The relevant clause of the 14th Amendment states: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Under the executive order, children born in the U.S. to parents who do not meet the requirements of being U.S. citizens, legal permanent residents, or members of the military would not automatically be granted citizenship. This would include children born to parents who are unlawfully present in the U.S., as well as those whose parents’ legal status is temporary, such as visitors or individuals on student or work visas. The order calls for a detailed implementation plan, requiring executive departments and agencies to issue public guidance within 30 days.
In statements, President Trump has referred to birthright citizenship as "ridiculous" and has emphasized the need to end it to deter illegal immigration. Trump’s administration has also argued that individuals from countries with high levels of immigration to the U.S., including India and China, have particularly exploited the system for personal gain. Trump has suggested that these countries' nationals have manipulated the law to gain U.S. citizenship for their children and ultimately increase their chances of securing permanent residency or citizenship through family-based immigration.
The executive order’s impact on immigration policy is significant, but the challenges of implementing such a sweeping change are considerable. In the U.S., altering constitutional provisions requires more than just executive action; it requires a constitutional amendment, a lengthy and complex process that involves significant political hurdles. Constitutional amendments require a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, followed by ratification by three-fourths of the state legislatures. Given the current partisan makeup of Congress, with Republicans holding a narrow majority in the Senate and Democrats controlling the House, the likelihood of such an amendment passing seems uncertain. Furthermore, the U.S. Supreme Court has historically upheld birthright citizenship, as evidenced by the landmark case United States v. Wong Kim Ark in 1898, which affirmed that a child born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents is still a U.S. citizen.
The legal challenges to Trump’s executive order have been swift, with immigrant rights groups immediately filing lawsuits. These lawsuits argue that the executive order undermines the Constitution's guarantees, as well as long-standing Supreme Court precedents, and violates the intent of Congress in enacting the 14th Amendment. Advocates for immigrant rights stress that the executive order cannot override the protections afforded by the Constitution without following the amendment process outlined therein.
One of the key groups that would be profoundly affected by the revocation of birthright citizenship is the Indian-American community, one of the fastest-growing immigrant populations in the U.S. As of 2024, Indian Americans number over 5.4 million, accounting for nearly 1.5% of the U.S. population. A significant portion of this population is composed of immigrants, many of whom are on temporary work visas such as the H-1B visa, and many others are in the process of waiting for permanent residency through green card applications. Under the proposed changes, children born to Indian nationals in the U.S. who are on temporary visas would no longer automatically acquire U.S. citizenship, which would have far-reaching consequences for their legal status, their parents' immigration process, and their future in the U.S.
The potential implications for Indian-American families include:
-
Loss of Automatic Citizenship: Indian parents who are in the U.S. on temporary work visas, such as the H-1B visa, would no longer be able to secure U.S. citizenship for their children born in the country. This would effectively deprive those children of a key legal benefit and could lead to long-term complications for them in terms of immigration status and rights.
-
Increased Wait Times for Green Card Holders: Indian immigrants already face long wait times in the green card process due to high demand and limited availability of immigrant visas. If children born to Indian parents no longer automatically acquire U.S. citizenship, the process for family reunification would become more complex and time-consuming, further delaying green card processing and leading to prolonged uncertainty for families.
-
Family Reunification Complications: U.S.-born children who do not receive automatic citizenship may no longer be able to petition for their parents' immigration status once they turn 21. This would present a significant challenge for family reunification, potentially separating families for extended periods or making it harder for children to bring their parents to the U.S.
-
Reduction of Birth Tourism: One of the main goals of the executive order is to curb "birth tourism," a term used to describe the practice of foreign nationals coming to the U.S. specifically to give birth and secure citizenship for their children. The Trump administration's stance suggests that this practice places undue pressure on the U.S. immigration system and exploits the birthright citizenship provision for economic or political gain.
-
Impact on Indian Students: Children born to Indian students on non-immigrant visas, such as F-1 student visas, would also face challenges in acquiring U.S. citizenship. Many Indian students come to the U.S. to pursue higher education, particularly in fields such as technology, engineering, and business. The executive order could create significant uncertainty for students' families, as it would be harder for their children to secure citizenship in the future.
-
Legal Uncertainty for Immigrant Families: The executive order could create confusion for many immigrant families, particularly those on temporary work visas, in terms of their children’s legal status. As many Indian immigrants already face legal complexities related to immigration, this new policy would add another layer of uncertainty to their lives, with potential long-term implications for their families and careers in the U.S.
This policy change could affect not only immigrant families but also have broader social and legal ramifications. A 2011 factsheet from the American Immigration Council warned that eliminating birthright citizenship could complicate the ability of U.S. citizens to prove their citizenship, as birth certificates are currently used as the primary proof of citizenship. If the birthright citizenship provision were removed, it could make it more difficult for American-born children to establish their citizenship status, leading to more legal battles and bureaucratic hurdles for U.S. citizens and immigrants alike.
The future of this policy remains uncertain, as the legal challenges to Trump’s executive order continue to mount. If this executive order is upheld, it could fundamentally reshape the U.S. immigration landscape, affecting millions of immigrant families, particularly those from countries like India, where temporary work visas are common. However, given the legal complexities involved in changing a constitutionally enshrined right, it is likely that the policy will undergo significant scrutiny in the courts before any lasting changes can be made. The outcome of this case could influence immigration policy for years to come and could reshape the legal definition of U.S. citizenship for future generations.
