In a highly charged and emotionally charged development, Sharmishtha Mukherjee, daughter of the esteemed former President of India Pranab Mukherjee, has publicly criticized Congress MP Rahul Gandhi for his recent trip to Vietnam. This criticism emerges just days after the nation mourned the passing of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a respected leader within his own party and the country at large. Mukherjee's remarks have ignited a fresh political controversy, intensifying the ongoing rivalry between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress (INC).
Context of the Controversy
The controversy centers around Rahul Gandhi's decision to travel to Vietnam shortly after the death of Manmohan Singh on August 31, 2020. Singh, who served as India's Prime Minister from 2004 to 2014, was a towering figure in Indian politics, known for his integrity, economic reforms, and diplomatic acumen. His sudden demise was met with an outpouring of grief across the nation, reflecting his significant impact on India's political and economic landscape.
Amidst this period of national mourning, Rahul Gandhi's trip to Vietnam raised eyebrows and sparked allegations from the BJP that Gandhi was exploiting Singh's death for political gain. The BJP, led by figures such as Amit Malviya, accused Gandhi of insensitivity and opportunism, suggesting that his timing was strategically aimed at diverting attention from the INC’s own challenges and consolidating his political influence.
Sharmishtha Mukherjee’s Criticism
Sharmishtha Mukherjee's criticism adds a personal and familial dimension to the political dispute. Speaking during an interview with India Today TV on Wednesday, Mukherjee expressed her disappointment and confusion over Gandhi’s actions during a time of national sorrow. She stated:
“As an ordinary, concerned citizen of the country, I would definitely like to question Rahul Gandhi on why, when the nation was mourning the death of a Prime Minister, who was a stalwart of his own party, did he have to take off for a foreign trip to celebrate New Year's? Why couldn't you wait? The sky wouldn't have fallen.”
Mukherjee further highlighted that she learned from news reports that on the day following Manmohan Singh's last rites, no Congress leader was present during the ash collection ritual. She contrasted this with her personal experience during her father's passing in 2020, when despite the restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic, she received individual condolences from party leaders. She questioned the absence of Congress leaders during Singh's final rites, emphasizing that, unlike her father's situation, there were no restrictions preventing such attendance.
“This is a time when the party should have strongly stood behind the former Prime Minister's family. When my father died, I got individual condolences from party leaders. It was fair enough that no one came after that since it was during the Covid-19 pandemic. But now there is no Covid, no restriction. Then why was no Congress leader present for the ash collection ritual? Why did Rahul Gandhi fly away? Why did he have to do that at a time like this?”
BJP's Accusations and the Backlash
The BJP's initial accusations came from Amit Malviya, the party's IT cell chief, who took to Twitter to lambast Gandhi for his Vietnam trip. Malviya's tweet read:
“While the country is mourning Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s demise, Rahul Gandhi has flown to Vietnam to ring in the New Year. Rahul Gandhi politicised and exploited Dr Singh’s death for his expedient politics but his contempt for him is unmissable.”
He further intensified his attack by bringing historical grievances into the conversation, stating:
“The Gandhis and the Congress hate the Sikhs. Never forget that Indira Gandhi desecrated the Darbar Sahib,” while referencing the infamous Operation Blue Star—a controversial military operation carried out in 1984 to remove Sikh militants from the Golden Temple in Amritsar.
These remarks by Malviya not only aimed to discredit Rahul Gandhi but also sought to evoke strong emotions among voters by highlighting past grievances against the Congress leadership.
Congress's Response
In response to the BJP's allegations, the Congress swiftly dismissed the accusations as unfounded and politically motivated attempts to tarnish the party's image. Senior Congress leader Manickam Tagore addressed the issue directly, countering Malviya's claims:
“If Mr. Gandhi travels privately, why does it bother you? Get well in New Year.”
This retort was aimed at minimizing the BJP's narrative by asserting that Gandhi's personal travel decisions should not be politicized. The Congress also highlighted the positive aspects of Gandhi's trip, suggesting that it was a legitimate visit rather than an opportunistic move.
Support Within the Congress
Adding to the defense of Rahul Gandhi, Harish Rawat, a senior Congress leader and former Chief Minister of Uttarakhand, defended Gandhi's trip to Vietnam by emphasizing the country's economic and social significance. Rawat stated:
“I believe Rahul Gandhi went to Vietnam to study and not to take rest. Vietnam is currently a model for its economic policies and its social system. He must have gone there to conduct a study on these subjects.”
Rawat further criticized the BJP's tactics, describing their approach as a "troller's brigade" focused solely on undermining Rahul Gandhi. He urged the party to focus on substantive issues rather than personal attacks.
“The BJP has no agenda. They are all Rahul Gandhi's troller's brigade. Some of the brigade members have been assigned only to troll Rahul Gandhi,” Rawat alleged.
Implications for Indian Politics
This latest exchange between the BJP and Congress underscores the intense rivalry that has long characterized Indian politics. The controversy highlights several key issues:
-
Political Opportunism: The BJP's allegations against Rahul Gandhi suggest a pattern of exploiting sensitive events for political gain, aiming to weaken the opposition's standing among voters.
-
Party Solidarity and Leadership: Sharmishtha Mukherjee’s comments reflect concerns within the Congress about the party's leadership and their commitment to honoring esteemed leaders like Manmohan Singh during times of national mourning.
-
Public Perception and Media Influence: The exchange demonstrates how political narratives are shaped and contested in the media, influencing public perception and voter sentiment ahead of elections.
-
Historical Grievances: By bringing up Operation Blue Star and alleged animosity towards Sikhs, the BJP is leveraging historical grievances to evoke emotional responses, aiming to draw parallels with current events to discredit the Congress leadership.
Looking Ahead
As the political drama unfolds, the focus remains on the upcoming Delhi Assembly elections, scheduled for February 5, with vote counting on February 8. Both parties are gearing up for a fierce contest, with the BJP aiming to regain ground in Delhi and the Congress striving to maintain its influence amidst internal challenges and public criticism.
As highlighted in previous discussions, the support extended by the Trinamool Congress (TMC) to AAP adds another layer of complexity to the political landscape. The alliances within the INDIA bloc are pivotal as they shape the strategies and dynamics leading up to the elections. AAP's decision to contest the Assembly elections alone, despite previously aligning with the Congress for the Lok Sabha polls, signals a strategic maneuver to capitalize on its stronghold in Delhi while navigating the support from other opposition factions.
Conclusion
Sharmishtha Mukherjee’s critique of Rahul Gandhi’s Vietnam trip has not only intensified the existing political rivalry between the BJP and Congress but has also highlighted deeper issues within the Congress party regarding leadership and solidarity during times of crisis. As the nation approaches the Delhi Assembly elections, these developments are likely to influence voter behavior and the overall political discourse, with both parties leveraging the controversy to rally their respective bases and shape public opinion. The coming weeks will be crucial in determining how these narratives play out and what impact they will have on the election outcomes and the future direction of Indian politics.
