Elon Musk’s social media platform X is facing the possibility of a landmark fine from the European Union, a move that could redefine how global tech giants interact with regulatory frameworks in powerful regions like Europe. According to The New York Times, the European Commission is considering a fine exceeding $1 billion against X for violating the Digital Services Act (DSA) — a sweeping law designed to ensure accountability, transparency, and safety on large digital platforms. If finalized, this would be the first major penalty under the DSA and one of the largest ever imposed on a technology company.
This case is particularly complex due to the private ownership of X by Elon Musk, unlike other tech titans like Meta, Google, and Apple, which are beholden to shareholders and stock market pressures. X’s private status makes the enforcement of penalties and compliance obligations trickier and politically sensitive.
One extraordinary aspect of the situation is the EU’s reported consideration of including Musk’s other companies — such as SpaceX — in its financial assessment of the fine. While this would be legally unprecedented, it signals that the EU may no longer be content with isolated corporate accountability and could be pushing toward personal responsibility for tech billionaires who own and control major online platforms.
Beyond financial penalties, X could be forced to undergo structural changes to its platform in the European Union. These changes may include implementing more stringent content moderation mechanisms, revamping how its algorithms recommend content, increasing advertising transparency, improving user reporting systems, and granting researchers greater access to data. All these adjustments aim to curb misinformation, protect vulnerable users, and increase digital safety, particularly in light of X’s weakened moderation practices under Musk’s leadership.
The EU’s concerns intensified after several incidents, including the spread of fake news and inflammatory content during the Israel-Palestine conflict. Regulators have closely examined the effectiveness of X’s Community Notes feature and whether it sufficiently addresses misleading or harmful content. In late 2023, the EU launched an official investigation to determine whether the platform—classified as a Very Large Online Platform (VLOP) under the DSA—had failed to comply with the law’s strict obligations. Earlier this year, the European Commission escalated the probe, demanding that X hand over sensitive internal documents, including details about its recommendation algorithms, ad tracking systems, and content moderation tools.
X, meanwhile, has taken a defiant stance, accusing the European Union of using the DSA as a political weapon. In a statement shared on its Global Government Affairs account, the company alleged that the EU’s planned enforcement actions represent “an unprecedented act of political censorship” and a violation of free speech principles. The company further stated that it has taken robust steps to align with the DSA and will “use every legal option available” to defend its business, users, and platform freedoms in Europe.
The case is not happening in isolation. It comes amid broader geopolitical tensions between the EU and the US over how to regulate digital markets and powerful tech companies. While the EU has positioned itself as a global leader in tech regulation, the U.S. government has often viewed Europe’s aggressive regulatory posture as hostile to American innovation and competitiveness. Reports suggesting that the EU is weighing lighter penalties for Apple and Meta—despite their alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act (DMA)—have prompted speculation that Europe is attempting to strike a delicate balance: appearing tough on tech while not alienating major American allies.
Adding to X’s global regulatory troubles is an intensifying dispute with the Indian government, where the company is currently challenging the enforcement of Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act. X contends that the Indian authorities are circumventing due legal process to demand the removal of certain content, thereby bypassing the safeguards enshrined in Section 69A, which outlines lawful and transparent takedown procedures. The platform argues that this approach undermines user rights, sets a dangerous precedent, and raises serious questions about freedom of expression in India.
Moreover, X has refused to join the Indian government’s Sahyog portal, which is designed to streamline content removal requests. The platform has labeled it a “Censorship Portal” lacking any legal basis, prompting backlash from Indian officials who criticized the company for using inflammatory and inaccurate language. The Indian government has since escalated its rhetoric, with some ministers hinting at tighter oversight of foreign digital platforms operating in India.
This legal standoff in India is especially consequential for Elon Musk, as his other companies—Tesla and SpaceX—are actively trying to enter the Indian market. Tesla is preparing to launch its electric vehicles in India, while SpaceX is negotiating with local telecom giants Reliance Jio and Bharti Airtel to bring its Starlink satellite internet services to Indian consumers. Any deterioration in Musk’s relationship with Indian regulators could severely impact those business goals.
As X battles on two major international fronts—Europe and India—the outcome of these confrontations could define the company’s trajectory for years to come. The EU’s final decision on the billion-dollar fine, expected by this summer, will serve as a global benchmark for how far regulators are willing to go to hold tech companies accountable, and whether ownership by a high-profile individual like Elon Musk offers any shield—or added scrutiny.
Would you like this written as a press release, a tweet thread, or something more visual like a slide deck?
